The Supreme Court of India raised pointed questions about the jail term of extradited gangster Abu Salem during a recent hearing. The court specifically asked how Salem managed to complete his 25-year sentence when he was arrested in 2005.
Court's Direct Question
"When arrested in 2005, how did he complete 25-year jail term?" the Supreme Court posed this direct question during the proceedings. This query came while the bench was examining the legal aspects of Salem's imprisonment period.
Background of the Case
The Supreme Court was hearing Abu Salem's plea challenging a July 2025 order from the Bombay High Court. That High Court order had stated that prima facie it appeared the period of 25 years was yet to be completed. The Bombay High Court had made this observation while considering the gangster's case.
Abu Salem, a key accused in the 1993 Mumbai serial blasts case, was extradited from Portugal to India in 2005. His extradition came after lengthy legal proceedings and diplomatic negotiations between the two countries.
Legal Proceedings Continue
The Supreme Court hearing represents the latest development in this long-running legal saga. The court's questioning indicates it is closely examining the mathematical calculation of Salem's jail term. Legal experts suggest this line of questioning could have significant implications for how prison terms are calculated in extradition cases.
The case continues to draw attention due to Salem's involvement in high-profile criminal cases. His extradition itself was a landmark moment in India's fight against organized crime. The current legal proceedings are being watched closely by law enforcement agencies and legal observers alike.
