Supreme Court Voices Displeasure Over Maneka Gandhi's Remarks
The Supreme Court of India made its displeasure clear on Tuesday. Former Union minister Maneka Gandhi faced sharp criticism from the apex court for her comments about a recent stray dog ruling.
The court stated that Gandhi's remarks qualified as contempt of court. However, the bench decided not to proceed with formal contempt charges. The judges cited their magnanimity as the reason for this decision.
Court Questions Gandhi's Contributions
The Supreme Court further questioned the BJP leader about her practical contributions to solving the stray dog problem. Judges specifically asked what budgetary allocations she had helped secure during her political career to address this issue.
This exchange occurred during a hearing about the growing stray dog problem in Delhi-NCR. The court has been reviewing the situation following a noticeable increase in dog bite incidents across the region.
Public Safety Remains Top Priority
The Supreme Court emphasized that public safety must come first in this matter. The bench specifically mentioned sensitive locations including schools, hospitals, and railway stations. These places require special attention according to the court's observations.
Judges also addressed the responsibility of people who feed stray dogs. The court stated that such individuals must act responsibly toward both the animals and the general public.
Accountability and Practical Solutions
The Supreme Court raised important questions about accountability. Who would be responsible if a stray dog attacks someone? This question remains central to the ongoing discussion.
The court suggested a practical approach for animal lovers. Those who wish to care for dogs should consider keeping them as licensed pets rather than allowing them to roam freely in public spaces.
Previous Ruling and Criticism
Last year, the Supreme Court issued specific directions regarding stray dogs. The order required their removal from educational institutions, hospitals, bus stations, and railway stations. The court also ruled that sterilized dogs should not return to these same areas.
Maneka Gandhi criticized this order in strong terms. She called it impractical and questioned its implementation. Gandhi specifically asked where thousands of removed dogs would be housed and how their removal would meaningfully address a population numbering in the lakhs.
The former minister compared the ruling to another controversial judgment. She expressed doubt about whether such measures could realistically be implemented given current infrastructure limitations.
The Supreme Court continues to grapple with balancing animal welfare concerns against public safety requirements. This complex issue affects urban residents across India's capital region and beyond.
