In a strongly worded observation that has sparked widespread discussion, the Telangana High Court has expressed deep concern over the rapid proliferation of liquor establishments across the state, with Justice B Vijaysen Reddy remarking that the situation might necessitate giving Telangana a "new name."
Court's Strong Stance During Residential Area Petition
The significant comments came during a hearing on Tuesday when Justice B Vijaysen Reddy was addressing a petition filed by the Sri Satyanarayana Colony Welfare Association. The petition challenged the establishment of a wine shop within their residential colony located in Medchal Malkajgiri district.
The welfare association alleged that licence holder S Pavan Reddy was illegally constructing temporary structures in open plots within their predominantly residential colony to operate the wine shop. The residents argued that such commercial establishments are strictly prohibited in residential zones according to existing regulations.
Authorities Under Scrutiny for Inaction
The petition brought serious allegations against local municipal authorities, claiming that Nagaram municipal officials had failed to take action despite multiple complaints about the unauthorized construction. The association specifically sought directions from the court to compel the excise department to cancel the liquor licence granted for the controversial location.
Adding weight to their case, the petitioners revealed that none of the candidates who secured liquor licences in the municipality had actually identified suitable premises for their shops yet, raising questions about the licensing process and its implementation.
Judicial Intervention and Future Directions
While hearing the matter, Justice B Vijaysen Reddy made his now-viral observation about the state potentially needing a new identity if the current trend of liquor shop expansion continues unchecked. "If opening liquor shops and restaurants in the state continues at the existing pace, we should give a new name to our Telangana," the judge remarked during the proceedings.
The judge acknowledged the judiciary's limited role in policy matters but firmly asserted that courts would do everything within their power to benefit society. He indicated that until the government formulates a clear policy regarding liquor shop establishments, the court might be compelled to issue directions regulating the display and visibility of such outlets to minimize their impact on residential communities.
Following the hearing, the court issued formal notices to all private parties involved in the case and directed the Prohibition and Excise Department along with Nagaram municipality to file counter-affidavits. The matter has been adjourned for subsequent hearing, keeping the door open for further judicial intervention if necessary.
This case highlights the growing tension between commercial interests and residential welfare in rapidly developing urban areas, with the judiciary stepping in to address concerns that local authorities have apparently overlooked.
