The Tamil Nadu government has taken decisive legal action, approaching the Madras High Court on Thursday with a plea to cancel the interim bail granted to controversial YouTuber Savukku Shankar. The state alleges that Shankar, who was released on medical grounds across 17 cases, has blatantly violated the conditions of his release.
Allegations of Misrepresentation and Breach
The core of the government's argument rests on the claim that Savukku Shankar lied about the severity of his medical conditions to secure interim bail. Furthermore, the prosecution presented evidence that, while ostensibly on bail for specialised treatment, Shankar was actively creating content. They alleged he produced eight videos, each approximately 60 minutes long, within a single week. This activity, the state contends, is inconsistent with someone requiring urgent medical respite and constitutes a clear breach of bail terms.
Court's Observations and Directive
A division bench comprising Justices P Velmurugan and M Jothiraman heard the state's application. The judges made a significant observation, noting that Shankar should not have engaged in the activities being alleged while on interim bail. The court has now directed Savukku Shankar to file his response to the government's cancellation plea. The deadline for his reply has been set for January 19.
Background of the Bail Grant
It is important to note that the interim bail in question was not sought by Shankar directly. The bail plea was filed by Shankar's mother, who appealed to the court for his release so he could undergo necessary and specialised medical treatment. The court had initially granted this relief on humanitarian grounds, which the state now argues has been exploited.
The case highlights the ongoing legal scrutiny surrounding the YouTuber and sets a crucial precedent on the enforcement of bail conditions, especially those granted for specific purposes like medical aid. The court's decision on January 19 will determine whether Savukku Shankar must return to custody.
