Congress MP Manish Tewari has strongly criticized the proposal to introduce a 2.5-year term for the Chandigarh mayor and deputy mayors, labeling it a 'terrible idea' that goes against democratic norms. Speaking to the media, Tewari argued that such a move would disrupt the stability and continuity of municipal governance in the city.
Tewari's Objections
Tewari, who represents the Chandigarh parliamentary constituency, expressed his concerns over the proposed change, which he believes is aimed at undermining the democratic process. He stated that the current system of a one-year term for the mayor, with rotation among different parties, has worked well and ensures representation for all sections of society. The introduction of a fixed 2.5-year term, he argued, would concentrate power in the hands of a single party and reduce accountability.
Impact on Governance
The MP further highlighted that the proposed term would lead to a lack of checks and balances, as the mayor and deputies would not face annual elections. This, he said, could result in complacency and a decline in the quality of governance. Tewari also pointed out that the change would require amendments to the Chandigarh Municipal Corporation Act, which should be debated thoroughly in the Parliament and not be rushed through without proper consultation.
Political Reactions
The proposal has drawn sharp reactions from other political parties as well, with many accusing the ruling party of trying to manipulate the municipal administration for its own benefit. The Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) and the Shiromani Akali Dal (SAD) have also voiced their opposition, calling the move undemocratic. However, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), which currently holds power in the Chandigarh Municipal Corporation, has defended the proposal, stating that it would bring stability and allow for long-term planning.
Background
The discussion around the term of the Chandigarh mayor has been ongoing for several years. Currently, the mayor is elected for a one-year term, with the position rotating among different parties based on a consensus or through elections. The proposal to extend the term to 2.5 years was reportedly mooted by some councillors who argued that a longer term would enable the mayor to implement policies more effectively.
However, critics argue that the move is politically motivated, as it would benefit the party that currently controls the corporation. Tewari's strong opposition adds to the growing chorus of dissent against the proposal. He has urged the central government to reconsider the plan and instead focus on strengthening democratic institutions at the grassroots level.
In conclusion, the controversy over the mayor's term highlights the broader debate about the balance between stability and democratic accountability in local governance. While proponents argue for longer terms to ensure continuity, opponents warn of the risks of concentrating power and reducing the frequency of electoral checks.
