Bhopal witnessed a major political controversy on November 29, 2025, when Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind president Maulana Mahmood Madani made startling allegations about the Indian judiciary's independence. The prominent Muslim leader claimed that courts have been functioning under government pressure for several years, specifically referencing landmark verdicts including the Babri Masjid case and triple talaq judgment.
Madani's Explosive Allegations
Speaking to media in Bhopal, Madra Pradesh, Maulana Mahmood Madani expressed serious concerns about judicial independence in India. The Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind president stated that after careful observation of several high-profile cases, it appears that courts are operating under government influence. He specifically mentioned that this pattern has been noticeable for the past few years across multiple significant verdicts that have shaped India's socio-political landscape.
Madani went further to question the Supreme Court's authority, making the controversial statement that the apex court has no right to call itself 'Supreme.' This remark immediately drew sharp reactions from political circles and legal experts across the country. The Muslim leader indicated that his organization has compiled several instances that supposedly demonstrate this alleged pattern of judicial compromise.
BJP's Strong Reaction
The response from Bharatiya Janata Party leadership was swift and severe. Senior BJP leader Sambit Patra immediately demanded that the Supreme Court take suo motu cognizance of Madani's statements. In his social media post, Patra emphasized that the court should hear this matter on its own initiative given the serious nature of the allegations against the judiciary.
Patra's statement highlighted the political tension surrounding the controversy, with the BJP leader asserting that such comments undermine the dignity and authority of India's highest judicial institution. The demand for suo motu action indicates the political significance attached to Madani's remarks and sets the stage for a potential legal confrontation.
Broader Implications
This controversy emerges against the backdrop of several landmark Supreme Court verdicts that have significantly impacted Indian society. The Babri Masjid case and triple talaq judgment represent some of the most consequential legal decisions in recent Indian history. Madani's comments suggest ongoing dissatisfaction within certain sections of the Muslim community regarding these verdicts.
The timing of these statements is particularly significant as they come at a time when judicial independence is being widely discussed in legal circles. Legal experts are divided on whether the Supreme Court will indeed take up the matter suo motu, as demanded by the BJP leadership. Some constitutional experts argue that while the court has such powers, it typically exercises them sparingly in matters of significant public importance.
The controversy has reignited debates about the relationship between the executive and judiciary in India. Political analysts suggest that this development could have far-reaching implications for how judicial pronouncements are perceived by different communities across the country. As the story develops, all eyes remain on whether the Supreme Court will respond to the growing demands for action against Madani's statements.
