Bharatpur MLA Seeks Court-Monitored Probe Over Viral Sting Video in Calcutta High Court
Kolkata witnessed a significant legal development on Friday as Bharatpur MLA and AJUP chief Humayun Kabir approached the Calcutta High Court with a formal petition. The legislator is demanding a comprehensive, court-monitored investigation into a controversial nineteen-minute viral sting video that has been circulating widely across digital platforms. This video purportedly features Kabir engaged in a conversation with an unidentified individual, making serious political allegations.
Allegations of AI Manipulation and Political Conspiracy
In his petition, Humayun Kabir has categorically stated that the viral video is a complete fabrication, artificially generated using advanced artificial intelligence technology. He asserts that this digital content was created as part of a deliberate and malicious conspiracy specifically designed to tarnish his public reputation and political standing. The MLA emphasized that the video's release was strategically timed to cause maximum damage to his credibility among constituents and political allies.
The controversial footage, which bears a timestamp of December 19, 2025, allegedly shows Kabir making startling claims about political arrangements. According to the video's content, the MLA purportedly tells an unidentified man that he maintained a covert understanding with BJP leader Suvendu Adhikari. The alleged agreement suggested that if Kabir managed to secure seventy to eighty legislative seats and the BJP achieved one hundred to one hundred twenty seats, he would extend his political support to help the BJP form the state government. In return for this support, Kabir would reportedly be appointed as the Deputy Chief Minister of West Bengal.
Legal Proceedings and Investigation Demands
The matter has been officially mentioned before Justice Saugata Bhattacharyya's bench at the Calcutta High Court. The court is scheduled to hear this significant case on April 22, where detailed arguments from both sides will be presented. Humayun Kabir's legal team has specifically requested the court to order a thorough investigation that would uncover the complete truth behind the video's creation and dissemination.
The MLA's petition outlines several critical demands for the proposed investigation. First, he seeks to identify the individuals or organizations responsible for creating the allegedly manipulated video content. Second, the petition demands clarification regarding the technical methods used to produce what Kabir claims is AI-generated footage. Third, the investigation should reveal the motives behind releasing this content publicly and the intended political consequences. Finally, Kabir wants legal action against those responsible for what he describes as character assassination through digital means.
Political Context and Video Circulation
The viral video gained significant traction after being shared by Trinamool Congress supporters on various social media platforms and messaging applications. This dissemination occurred despite Kabir's immediate denials and claims of technological manipulation. The timing of the video's release coincides with increasing political tensions in West Bengal, where allegations of cross-party understandings and secret agreements have become frequent topics of public discussion.
Humayun Kabir has repeatedly stated that the video's content directly contradicts his public political positions and longstanding commitments to his constituents. He maintains that the technological sophistication evident in the video suggests involvement of professional digital manipulation experts, possibly working at the behest of political opponents seeking to undermine his credibility. The MLA's decision to approach the judiciary rather than engaging in public rebuttals demonstrates his confidence in legal processes to establish truth.
This case represents one of the first major instances in Indian politics where a sitting legislator has formally approached the High Court alleging AI-generated content manipulation for political defamation purposes. The outcome could establish important legal precedents regarding digital evidence, artificial intelligence manipulation, and political accountability in the age of sophisticated technological tools capable of creating convincing fake media content.
