In a fiery election rally that set the political stage ablaze in Bihar, Congress MP Rahul Gandhi delivered a blistering critique of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, alleging that the country's leader is being "remote-controlled" by industrial giants Gautam Adani and Mukesh Ambani.
The Remote Control Allegation
Gandhi didn't mince words as he addressed the gathering, painting a picture of a prime minister whose strings are pulled by corporate interests. "The person sitting in Delhi is not running the country," Gandhi asserted, "He is being remote-controlled by two individuals - Adani and Ambani."
Electoral Bonds Controversy
The Congress leader sharpened his attack by referencing the recent electoral bonds data, suggesting a disturbing pattern of corporate influence. "The electoral bonds have revealed everything," Gandhi claimed, pointing to what he described as a clear connection between political decisions and corporate funding.
Battle for Bihar Intensifies
The timing of these allegations is significant as Bihar witnesses intense political campaigning. Gandhi's remarks come as part of the opposition's strategy to challenge the ruling NDA alliance in the state, where every seat could prove crucial in the larger political landscape.
Corporate-Political Nexus Questioned
Gandhi's speech touched upon broader concerns about the relationship between big business and political power in India. He questioned whether policy decisions were being made in the interest of the common people or to benefit specific corporate entities.
Political Repercussions
The allegations have added fuel to an already heated political environment, with both sides preparing for a tough electoral battle. The Congress leader's direct attack on what he calls the "Adani-Ambani control" over the government is likely to become a central theme in the opposition's campaign strategy.
As the political temperature rises in Bihar, these allegations have set the stage for what promises to be one of the most closely watched electoral contests in recent times, with implications that could resonate far beyond the state's borders.
