In a significant development in Parliament, the government has expressed its willingness to engage in discussions on the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) issue. However, it has firmly opposed the imposition of fixed timelines by the Opposition for the debate.
Rijiju Responds to Kharge's Demand
The statement came from Union Minister for Parliamentary Affairs Kiren Rijiju on Monday. This was in direct response to the demand made by the Leader of Opposition in Rajya Sabha, Mallikarjun Kharge. Kharge had insisted that a discussion on the crucial SIR matter must begin in the House immediately.
Rijiju addressed the media, clarifying the government's position. He emphasized that while the administration is prepared to talk about any subject, it believes that setting rigid deadlines for parliamentary proceedings is not appropriate. The minister argued that such a practice could disrupt the detailed and thoughtful examination of complex issues.
Path Forward: Tuesday Consultations
To break the impasse and find a way forward, Kiren Rijiju announced that he will hold consultations with leaders of various political parties on Tuesday. The goal of these talks is to chalk out a mutually agreeable solution and a feasible schedule for the SIR debate.
The government's stance indicates a preference for a structured discussion that follows established parliamentary procedures, rather than one dictated by immediate deadlines. This development, reported by PTI on December 2, 2025, highlights the ongoing tussle between the ruling dispensation and the opposition over the parliamentary agenda.
Implications for Parliamentary Proceedings
The outcome of Tuesday's consultations will be closely watched, as it will determine when and how the significant SIR issue is taken up in Parliament. The Opposition's push for immediate discussion underscores the political importance they attach to the subject.
This episode reflects the broader dynamics of Indian democracy, where debate scheduling itself becomes a point of negotiation. The government's open yet condition-based approach aims to balance the need for discussion with its own procedural preferences.
