Bengaluru residents have approached Deputy Chief Minister D K Shivakumar seeking his intervention in what they describe as a 'discriminatory' waste management fee structure. Under the current framework, independent houses are required to pay between Rs 1,200 and Rs 1,800 annually, depending on the built-up area. This fee is collected along with property tax and does not attract Goods and Services Tax (GST).
Unequal fee structure
Residents argue that the fee is unfairly applied, with independent house owners bearing a higher burden compared to apartment dwellers. They claim that the fee calculation does not account for the actual waste generated, leading to disparities. The fee, which is mandatory for all property owners, has sparked protests in several wards across the city.
Appeal to Deputy CM
A delegation of residents from various localities met with Shivakumar, who also holds the Bengaluru development portfolio, to present their grievances. They urged him to review the fee structure and ensure a more equitable system. The residents emphasized that the current model penalizes those living in independent houses, who often have smaller families and generate less waste.
Shivakumar assured the delegation that he would look into the matter and consult with the Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP) officials. He noted that the government aims to provide efficient waste management services while ensuring fairness in fee collection.
Background of waste fee
The waste management fee was introduced by the BBMP to cover the costs of door-to-door waste collection, transportation, and processing. The fee varies based on property type and size, with independent houses charged a fixed annual amount. However, apartment complexes are often charged a lower per-unit fee, leading to accusations of discrimination.
Residents have also pointed out that the fee is collected irrespective of whether the property is occupied or vacant. They have called for a more transparent and usage-based pricing model.
The issue has gained traction on social media, with many residents sharing their experiences and demanding a revision of the fee structure. Some have even threatened to withhold payment until the BBMP addresses their concerns.
As the matter awaits further action, residents hope that Shivakumar's intervention will lead to a fair resolution. The BBMP has stated that it is open to feedback and will consider revisions if necessary.
