The chief of the Greater Bengaluru Authority (GBA) has advised protesters opposing the proposed tunnel road project to approach the court for resolution. This comes as citizens in Bengaluru have raised strong objections to the project, citing potential environmental damage and increased traffic congestion.
Background of the Tunnel Road Project
The tunnel road project, aimed at decongesting Bengaluru's traffic, has been met with mixed reactions. While the government promotes it as a solution to the city's chronic traffic jams, residents and environmentalists argue that it will lead to deforestation and worsen air quality. The GBA chief, speaking at a press conference, emphasized that the project has undergone necessary clearances and that legal recourse is the appropriate channel for dissent.
Citizens' Concerns
Protesters have been staging demonstrations across the city, demanding a halt to the project. They claim that the tunnel road will destroy green cover and disrupt local ecosystems. Additionally, they fear that the construction phase will cause severe traffic disruptions. The GBA chief, however, dismissed these concerns, stating that the project will ultimately benefit the city.
Legal Path Advised
In response to the protests, the GBA chief said, "If citizens have genuine grievances, they should go to court. We have followed all legal procedures, and the project is in the public interest." He urged protesters to refrain from illegal demonstrations and instead seek judicial intervention. The government remains committed to the project, which is expected to reduce travel time by 50%.
Project Details
- The tunnel road will span 18 kilometers from Hebbal to Silk Board.
- It is estimated to cost Rs 15,000 crore.
- Construction is expected to begin in 2025 and be completed by 2028.
The GBA chief reiterated that all environmental impact assessments have been conducted and the project meets regulatory standards. He assured that mitigation measures will be implemented to minimize ecological damage.
Reactions from Stakeholders
Environmental groups have vowed to continue their protests and may file a public interest litigation in the Karnataka High Court. Meanwhile, commuters are divided, with some supporting the project for its potential to ease traffic, while others worry about the long-term environmental costs.



