Bengaluru: The Karnataka High Court has dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) petition challenging the state government's decision to transfer seven acres of land belonging to the Karnataka Veterinary, Animal and Fisheries Sciences University (KVAFSU) in Hebbal for the construction of judges' quarters and a super-specialty hospital.
Background of the Case
The petition questioned a government order dated January 8, 2026, which directed the transfer of four acres of land at the veterinary college campus, adjacent to Nyayagrama, for residential quarters for High Court judges, and another three acres for the construction of a super-specialty hospital.
Court's Observation
A division bench of Justice DK Singh and Justice TM Nadaf dismissed the petition, holding that the land transfer was a government policy decision and found no grounds for judicial interference. The bench observed, "The transfer of 4+3 acres, totalling seven acres, is a policy decision for construction of residences for HC judges and a super-specialty hospital for the general public." It noted that courts generally do not interfere with policy decisions unless they are arbitrary, procedurally flawed, or clearly contrary to the law.
Arguments of the Petitioners
The PIL plea was jointly filed by the Karnataka Veterinary Association, Bengaluru Veterinary College Alumni, and two other organisations. The petitioners argued that the transfer would adversely affect the veterinary college's teaching, research, and extension activities. They also expressed concerns that it could impact the institution's recognition by the Veterinary Council of India and future accreditation assessments.
Court's Analysis
After examining the records, the court noted that a veterinary college is required to have around 150 acres of land under applicable regulations, while KVAFSU currently has about 278 acres. "The transfer of seven acres out of the total extent of approximately 278 acres would not, in any manner, affect the minimum land requirements prescribed under the regulations," the bench said.
Importance of Judges' Quarters
The court further observed that providing fully furnished official accommodation to High Court and Supreme Court judges is part of the state's responsibility and an important aspect of ensuring judicial independence. The bench also took note of the fact that only 19 official residences are available to High Court judges against the strength of 62 in the state, leaving several judges to live in rented accommodation.
Public Interest in Hospital
Regarding the hospital project, the bench said allotting three acres for a super-specialty hospital would serve the larger public interest. Holding that both projects were in the larger public interest, the court rejected the petition.
Stay updated with the latest Bengaluru news. Download the TOI App.
