The newly notified Maharashtra Right to Information (RTI) Rules, 2026 have sparked strong criticism from activists and regular users, who claim the provisions create significant barriers for citizens and dilute the spirit of the landmark 2005 transparency law. The rules, issued on June 12, replace the previous framework governing RTI applications in the state.
Major Fee Hikes and New Charges
Among the most significant changes is a threefold increase in the RTI application fee from Rs 10 to Rs 30. Charges for obtaining copies of documents have also risen from Rs 2 to Rs 5 per page. Citizens seeking to inspect records will now pay Rs 50 per hour after the first free hour. Appeals against decisions of public information officers will attract fees of Rs 50 for first appeals and Rs 100 for second appeals before the State Information Commission.
Strict Structural Constraints
The 2026 rules introduce strict structural constraints. Every RTI application must now be restricted to a single subject limited to approximately 150 words. If an application contains multiple queries, the Public Information Officer (PIO) may process only the first issue and direct the applicant to file separate applications for the rest.
Additionally, applicants are now required to submit self-attested photo identification to establish citizenship with every application. Failure to provide ID may result in the application being returned.
Activists Condemn Requirements
Activists argue these requirements contradict the RTI Act's core objective of providing a simple, citizen-friendly mechanism for accountability. Vihar Durve, an activist, stated, "No amendment can be made that goes beyond the basic tenets of Section 6(2) of the RTI Act, which states that an applicant shall not be required to give any reason for requesting information. Mandating citizenship proof at the application stage and imposing word limits will only increase litigation and discourage the common man."
The rules also grant PIOs more discretion to deny copies. If information is already available on a government website, authorities can simply direct the applicant to the link rather than providing physical or digital copies. Additionally, "repetitive" applications can now be disposed of without a detailed hearing.
Modernising Touches and Exemptions
The 2026 rules do include some modernising touches. RTI fees can now be paid via UPI and other electronic modes, and communication through email is now formally recognised. Citizens below the poverty line (BPL) remain exempt from fees, though this is now capped—only the first 50 pages of voluminous information will be provided free of cost.
Impact on Transparency
Activists contend that the cumulative effect of higher fees, word counts, and identity requirements will stifle transparency. Another veteran activist commented, "The RTI Act was designed to make information accessible. Any measure that increases costs and procedural barriers risks weakening the public's ability to hold the government accountable."
The rules are now in force across Maharashtra. Legal experts and RTI unions are currently examining the provisions to determine if they can withstand a challenge in the high court for potentially overstepping the parent RTI Act of 2005.
