The Madhya Pradesh High Court on Friday delivered a landmark verdict, declaring the Bhojshala complex in Dhar district as a temple and granting all demands of the Hindu side. The court directed the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) to facilitate worship by Hindus and remove any disputed structures from the site.
Court's Ruling and Key Directions
In its judgment, the High Court upheld the petition filed by Hindu groups seeking recognition of Bhojshala as a temple dedicated to Goddess Saraswati. The court stated that historical evidence supports the claim that the site was originally a temple before being converted into a mosque. The ASI, which currently manages the site, has been ordered to allow Hindu prayers and rituals without obstruction.
The bench, comprising Justice Rajendra Kumar Verma and Justice Anil Verma, emphasized that the site's religious character must be restored. The court also directed the removal of any non-Hindu religious symbols and structures that were added later.
Background of the Dispute
The Bhojshala complex, built by Raja Bhoj in the 11th century, has been a contentious issue between Hindu and Muslim communities. Hindus consider it a temple of Goddess Saraswati, while Muslims claim it as a mosque named Kamal Maula. The ASI had maintained the site as a protected monument, allowing limited access to both communities.
The dispute escalated in 2023 when the Hindu side filed a petition demanding unrestricted worship. The High Court had earlier ordered a survey of the site, which revealed evidence of a temple underneath the existing structure.
Reactions and Implications
Hindu groups welcomed the verdict, calling it a historic victory for faith and justice. Leaders of the Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) and other organizations celebrated outside the court, distributing sweets. Muslim groups expressed disappointment and stated they would challenge the decision in the Supreme Court.
Security has been tightened in Dhar district to prevent any communal clashes. Authorities have imposed Section 144 in the area, prohibiting gatherings of more than four people.
The verdict is expected to have broader implications for similar disputes across India, where religious sites are contested between communities. Legal experts say the judgment reinforces the principle that historical wrongs must be corrected through judicial process.
