In a fiery response that has ignited fresh political debate, Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma has firmly countered noted social activist Medha Patkar's criticism of the state's ongoing eviction drives. The CM declared that the removal of encroachers from protected areas will continue unabated, regardless of opposition.
The Confrontation Escalates
The war of words erupted after Medha Patkar, during her visit to Assam, voiced strong objections to the state government's eviction policies. The veteran activist known for her Narmada Bachao Andolan work had condemned what she described as "forced displacements" of local communities.
Chief Minister Sarma didn't mince words in his retaliation. "We respect everyone's right to protest, but we cannot allow protected forests and national parks to be destroyed by illegal encroachers," the CM asserted during a press interaction.
Government's Stance on Land Protection
The Assam government has been particularly focused on clearing encroachments from critical biodiversity zones, including:
- Kaziranga National Park: A UNESCO World Heritage Site facing significant encroachment issues
- Other protected forest areas: Multiple reserve forests across the state
- Government land: Public properties illegally occupied
"Our primary responsibility is to protect Assam's natural heritage and ensure that protected areas remain free from illegal settlements," Sarma emphasized, highlighting the environmental justification behind the drives.
Historical Context of Eviction Drives
The current administration has conducted several high-profile eviction operations since coming to power, often facing criticism from opposition parties and human rights organizations. However, the government maintains that these actions are necessary for:
- Wildlife conservation and habitat protection
- Preventing environmental degradation
- Upholding the rule of law
- Protecting genuine land rights of indigenous communities
Political Ramifications
This latest exchange underscores the ongoing tension between development agendas and activist concerns in Northeast India. The Chief Minister's unequivocal stance signals the government's determination to continue its land protection policies, setting the stage for potential future confrontations with civil society groups.
The controversy comes at a time when several northeastern states are grappling with similar issues of land rights, indigenous protection, and environmental conservation, making this standoff particularly significant for regional politics.
