Assam Minister Urges Opposition: Stop Politicizing Zubeen Garg Case, Trust Judiciary
Assam Minister: Stop politicizing Zubeen Garg case

Assam Minister Pijush Hazarika has come out strongly in defense of the state's judiciary while issuing a stern warning to opposition parties attempting to capitalize on the high-profile Zubeen Garg case for political mileage.

Minister's Strong Stance on Judicial Integrity

In a recent statement that's creating waves across political circles, Minister Hazarika expressed unwavering confidence in the judicial system's ability to handle the controversial case involving renowned singer Zubeen Garg. "The judiciary knows its job perfectly well," Hazarika asserted, emphasizing that the courts require no external pressure or political interference to deliver justice.

Opposition Under Fire for Political Exploitation

The minister didn't mince words when addressing opposition parties, accusing them of deliberately politicizing the sensitive legal matter. "The opposition should refrain from politicizing every issue," Hazarika stated, highlighting what he sees as a concerning trend of using legal cases as political weapons rather than allowing due process to unfold naturally.

Background of the Controversial Case

The Zubeen Garg case has been a subject of intense public interest and media scrutiny in recent times. The popular singer's legal troubles have drawn significant attention, with various political factions attempting to position themselves around the unfolding drama.

Minister Hazarika's comments come at a crucial juncture when the case is progressing through the legal system. His defense of judicial independence sends a clear message that the government believes in letting the courts function without political pressure from any quarter.

Broader Implications for Assam Politics

This development highlights the ongoing tension between the ruling establishment and opposition parties in Assam. The minister's strong stance suggests the government is drawing clear boundaries regarding what constitutes fair political discourse versus inappropriate interference in judicial matters.

Political observers note that Hazarika's statement reflects the administration's strategy to position itself as a defender of institutional integrity while painting the opposition as opportunistic actors willing to compromise judicial independence for political gains.

As the legal proceedings continue, all eyes remain on how this high-stakes political and legal drama will unfold in the coming weeks, with the minister's comments setting the stage for what promises to be an intense political battle over the proper boundaries between judiciary and politics.