Major Financial Irregularities Uncovered in Garhwa Panchayat
In a significant development in Garhwa district, Deputy Commissioner Dinesh Kumar Yadav on Friday recommended the suspension of Dole panchayat mukhiya Pushpa Devi and initiated punitive measures against six staff members. The action comes following serious allegations of gross negligence and fraudulent financial activities involving government scheme funds.
Fake Account and Ghost Beneficiaries Exposed
The investigation revealed that a fake account was created under the Abua Awas Yojna scheme, with payments being made to non-existent beneficiaries for a sanctioned pond that was never constructed. District-level officials conducted a thorough inquiry into the matter and confirmed all allegations to be true.
"Show-cause notices were issued to all accused individuals, but their responses were found to be unsatisfactory and unconvincing," stated DC Yadav while explaining the rationale behind the strict actions.
Stringent Actions Against Officials
The Deputy Commissioner has formally recommended to the Panchayati Raj director that Dole panchayat mukhiya Pushpa Devi be suspended for her alleged involvement in the fraudulent withdrawal of Abua Awas Yojna funds. Investigations revealed that the funds, originally meant for MGNREGA worker payments, were diverted despite there being no legitimate beneficiaries for the scheme.
In parallel actions, Dole panchayat secretary Arun Kumar was suspended under section 9(1) of the Jharkhand Sarkar Sewak Regulation. Additionally, Chinia block project officer (BPO) of MGNREGA, Raushan Kumar, faced suspension, while computer assistant Anup Kumar Singh and Rozgar sevak Shravan Kerketta were relieved from their duties.
Recovery Measures Initiated
Demonstrating zero tolerance towards financial misconduct, DC Yadav has directed Chinia Block Development Officer (BDO) Subodh Kumar to ensure complete recovery of the misappropriated funds from all accused persons. This move underscores the administration's commitment to financial accountability and proper utilization of public money.
The case has brought to light the need for stricter monitoring of fund disbursement under government welfare schemes, particularly in rural development projects where transparency is crucial for effective implementation.
