Panaji Mayor Outlines CCP's Limited Authority Over Casino Operations
In a significant clarification regarding the contentious issue of offshore casinos in Goa, Panaji Mayor Rohit Monserrate has stated that the Corporation of the City of Panaji (CCP) holds no jurisdiction over the licensing or docking of casino vessels in the Mandovi River. This statement comes in response to mounting concerns from local residents over a proposed new offshore casino vessel being assembled in the river, specifically between the Captain of Ports jetty and Santa Monica jetty.
Resident Protests and the AAP-Led Delegation
Earlier in the day, a delegation of Panaji residents, led by AAP Goa president Valmiki Naik, submitted a formal memo to Mayor Monserrate. The memo demanded that permissions for casinos be revoked, citing a dramatic increase in negative impacts over the past 12 to 15 years. Naik highlighted severe issues faced by the community, including escalated traffic congestion, rising crime rates, prostitution, and drug-related problems. He emphasized the frustration of city dwellers, noting, "People in the gram sabha have their voice, but people who live in the city don't." The delegation urged the mayor to reject any new casino proposals outright.
Mayor Monserrate's Detailed Response
Addressing these concerns, Mayor Monserrate explained that while he is personally opposed to casinos and gambling, the CCP's role is strictly limited. "What happens in the river has nothing to do with the corporation," he stated, clarifying that casinos operating on water do not require licenses from the CCP. He confirmed that the council would discuss the residents' appeal at its upcoming meeting on February 12, but stressed that the corporation has no authority over river-based operations.
Monserrate elaborated that casinos only need to approach the CCP for trade licenses if they establish offices on land. "Water does not come under the CCP at all. The corporation has no role in issuing any licence for any casino operating in the river," he reiterated. Despite his personal stance against gambling, he acknowledged the economic contributions of casinos to the city, suggesting this as a reason for their tolerance among some residents.
Broader Implications and Social Concerns
The mayor also pointed out ongoing issues such as parking problems and social concerns linked to casino operations, which he believes should be addressed by the state government. "I don't gamble and I don't like the habit either, but they are in the city and they are contributing a lot to the economy, and that is one reason why people are tolerating it. There are certain issues that we have, like parking; there are social issues... that should be corrected by govt," Monserrate added, reinforcing his call for governmental intervention in mitigating the adverse effects on the community.
This development underscores the complex interplay between local governance, economic interests, and resident welfare in Panaji, as the city grapples with the persistent challenge of balancing casino revenues with social well-being.
