High Court Overturns Haryana Government's Decision Denying Kabaddi Star's Appointment
The Punjab and Haryana High Court has delivered a significant ruling, setting aside the Haryana government's 2021 order that denied eminent kabaddi player Suresh Kumar appointment to a Group-A post. In a strongly worded judgment, the court termed the state's decision as "arbitrary, discriminatory, and unsustainable in law", directing authorities to reconsider his case on par with other sports appointees.
Court Mandates Swift Reconsideration Process
Justice Sandeep Moudgil, while disposing of the petition filed by Kumar, ordered the Haryana government to finalize the reconsideration process within four weeks of the court order. The bench emphasized that fair dealing must be a cornerstone of administrative actions, particularly when concerning individuals who have brought international laurels to the country through their sporting achievements.
Background of the Case and Petitioner's Credentials
Suresh Kumar, a decorated international kabaddi player who represented India on multiple global stages, had applied for a high-ranking post under the Haryana Outstanding Sports Persons (Recruitment & Conditions of Service) Rules, 2018. Despite his "superior merit" and the availability of vacant positions, his application was rejected by the state government on November 17, 2021.
In his petition before the high court, Kumar sought parity with other similarly situated athletes who had already secured government appointments. His counsel argued that the state failed to honor its own consistent past policy and the "legitimate expectations" of world-class performers.
Court's Observations on Policy Application and Merit
The bench observed that while the state government has the authority to frame and change policies, such changes cannot be applied in a manner that unfairly targets specific individuals or ignores established merit. The court specifically noted that Kumar not only excelled in his sport but also completed professional sports coaching diplomas, further strengthening his eligibility for the position.
"The petitioner has been denied parity without justification," Justice Moudgil observed in the final order while quashing the 2021 rejection order that blocked Kumar's appointment. The court's ruling underscores the importance of consistent and fair application of sports recruitment policies, especially for athletes who have represented the nation at international levels.
Implications for Sports Recruitment Policies
This judgment has broader implications for how state governments implement sports recruitment policies. The court's emphasis on:
- Non-discriminatory application of rules
- Recognition of international sporting achievements
- Consistency in policy implementation
- Timely resolution of such matters
sets a precedent for similar cases involving sports persons seeking government appointments based on their athletic accomplishments and qualifications.
