Taipei [Taiwan] July 4 (ANI): Taiwan has strongly criticised China's newly enforced "Ethnic Unity and Progress Promotion Law," describing it as another example of Beijing's authoritarian governance and warning that the legislation could be used to justify political pressure beyond China's borders, as reported by The Taipei Times.
Taiwan's Response and New Interagency Platform
According to The Taipei Times, speaking after the law came into force, Taiwan Premier Cho Jung-tai announced that the government would establish a Cabinet-level interagency platform to coordinate responses to cases of alleged transnational repression and strengthen measures to protect Taiwan's national security and democratic system.
Premier Cho said Taiwan's response would focus on three areas: prevention, protection and countermeasures. He tasked ministers without portfolio Ma Yung-cheng and Lin Min-hsin with creating a cross-government coordination mechanism involving agencies including the Ministry of the Interior, the Ministry of Justice and the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC).
Details of the Ethnic Unity Law
The law, approved by China's National People's Congress in March and effective from July 3, emphasises national unity and allows legal action against individuals or organisations, inside or outside China, accused of undermining ethnic unity or encouraging ethnic division. However, the legislation does not clearly define what actions constitute such offences, raising concerns about its broad scope.
Taiwan's Ministry of Foreign Affairs would also expand cooperation with like-minded countries to counter what Taipei views as Beijing's growing cross-border influence.
Taiwan's Accusations of 'Unification by Law'
The Mainland Affairs Council argued that the legislation is designed to advance Beijing's political agenda through what it described as "unification by law," "forced unification" and "transnational repression," as highlighted by The Taipei Times. The council said the measure effectively seeks to impose an obligation on Taiwanese people to accept unification with China under the banner of ethnic solidarity, calling it a "unification law" disguised as legislation promoting unity.
Reaffirming Taiwan's position, the council stated that Taiwan is an independent sovereign state and rejected what it described as Beijing's attempt to use legal instruments to erode Taiwan's autonomy, as reported by The Taipei Times.
Impact and Broader Implications
The law's vague definitions have sparked fears of extraterritorial application, potentially targeting Taiwanese officials, activists, or businesses. Taiwan's new interagency platform aims to provide a coordinated defense against such pressures, including legal assistance and public awareness campaigns. The move signals escalating tensions between Taipei and Beijing over sovereignty and democratic governance.
