Afghan Shooter Vetted Under Trump, Fact-Check Reveals
Afghan Shooter Was Vetted Under Trump Administration

A major political controversy has erupted in the United States following a shocking shooting incident near the White House. The attack has sparked heated debates about immigration policies and refugee vetting procedures, with fact-checks revealing surprising information about the perpetrator's background.

The White House Shooting Incident

On November 26, 2025, an Afghan national identified as Rahmanullah Lakanwal opened fire near the White House, shooting two National Guard troops. The incident immediately triggered a security alert and prompted investigations into how the shooter gained access to the area and what motivated his actions.

The shooting occurred in a high-security zone, raising serious questions about protection measures around key government installations. Both injured National Guard members received immediate medical attention, though their current condition remains undisclosed to the public.

Political Fallout and Fact-Check Revelation

Homeland Security Chief Kristi Noem quickly pointed fingers at the Biden administration, accusing them of allowing "unvetted" Afghan refugees into the country. Her statement ignited immediate political controversy and media attention around the case.

However, subsequent fact-checking investigations uncovered a stunning twist in the narrative. Contrary to the initial accusations, Rahmanullah Lakanwal had undergone thorough vetting procedures not once, but twice. Even more surprisingly, records show that his asylum application was actually approved under President Donald Trump's administration in April 2025.

This revelation has complicated the political narrative, showing that the shooter's entry into the United States followed proper channels during the previous administration rather than the current one.

Growing Political Tensions and Future Implications

Former President Donald Trump has responded to the incident by vowing to investigate all Afghan nationals currently residing in the United States if he returns to power. This declaration signals potential significant changes to American immigration policy regardless of which party controls the White House.

The situation has exposed deep divisions in American politics regarding:

  • Refugee vetting procedures and their effectiveness
  • Political responsibility for security failures
  • Future direction of US immigration policy
  • Treatment of Afghan refugees following the withdrawal

Meanwhile, additional details have emerged about the shooter's background. FBI raids uncovered disturbing aspects of Rahmanullah Lakanwal's living conditions, revealing he had no proper bedding—only cushions—and was reportedly engaged in marathon sessions of Call of Duty before the attack.

The incident occurs against a backdrop of other international tensions, including escalating conflicts with Venezuela and ongoing geopolitical challenges, suggesting America faces multiple security concerns simultaneously.

As investigations continue, the fundamental question remains: How will this incident shape America's approach to immigration and national security in the coming years? The answer could determine the direction of US policy for the foreseeable future.