The Supreme Court has agreed to hear a plea challenging the Central Board of Secondary Education's (CBSE) policy that makes the study of three languages compulsory for students in Class 9. Senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi mentioned the matter before a bench comprising Chief Justice Surya Kant and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and Vipul M Pancholi on Thursday.
Bench to Take Up Case Next Week
The bench indicated that the petition would be listed for hearing next week. The plea questions the validity of the CBSE directive, which mandates students to study three languages from the academic session starting in 2026. The policy has sparked debate among parents, educators, and students, with many arguing that it adds unnecessary burden on students.
Arguments Against the Policy
Counsel for the petitioners contended that the three-language formula, as implemented by CBSE, violates the right to education under Article 21 of the Constitution. They argued that it imposes an additional language requirement without considering the regional and linguistic diversity of the country. The petitioners also highlighted that the policy could lead to increased stress among students and may not be feasible in schools that lack adequate language teachers.
CBSE's Stand
The CBSE, in its affidavit, defended the policy stating that it aims to promote multilingualism and national integration. The board argued that learning multiple languages enhances cognitive abilities and prepares students for a globalized world. However, the petitioners countered that the policy should be optional rather than compulsory.
Background of the Policy
The CBSE introduced the three-language policy in line with the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020, which recommends that students learn at least three languages. The board made it compulsory for classes 9 and 10, requiring students to study two Indian languages and one foreign language, or three Indian languages. The policy has been challenged in several high courts, with some staying its implementation.
Next Steps
The Supreme Court is expected to hear the matter next week and may issue an interim order on the implementation of the policy. The outcome of this case will have significant implications for students, schools, and the education system across the country.
