Kerala High Court Strikes Down Mohanlal's Ivory Possession Certificates in Landmark Wildlife Ruling
Kerala HC invalidates Mohanlal's ivory certificates

In a significant legal development that has sent shockwaves through Kerala's film industry and wildlife conservation circles, the Kerala High Court has delivered a stern verdict against acclaimed actor Mohanlal regarding his possession of ivory tusks.

The court declared all certificates that previously authorized the Malayalam superstar to possess four ivory tusks as invalid and legally unsustainable, marking a crucial victory for wildlife protection advocates.

The Legal Battle Unfolds

The controversy dates back to 2022 when the Forest Department initiated legal action against the veteran actor after discovering he possessed four ivory tusks without valid documentation. Mohanlal had claimed the tusks were family heirlooms gifted to him in 1978 and 1982.

However, Justice S. Manikumar and Justice Shaji P. Chaly, presiding over the case, firmly stated that "the certificates issued by the additional chief secretary were not in accordance with the provisions of the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972."

What This Ruling Means

The court's decision underscores several critical points about wildlife protection in India:

  • No individual, regardless of celebrity status, is above wildlife protection laws
  • Proper documentation and legal procedures must be strictly followed for possessing any wildlife articles
  • The Wildlife Protection Act provisions must be implemented without exceptions

The judges emphasized that the state government lacked the authority to issue such certificates for possessing ivory articles, reinforcing the strict nature of India's wildlife protection framework.

Broader Implications for Wildlife Conservation

This landmark judgment sends a powerful message about India's commitment to combating illegal wildlife trade and possession. The court's firm stance demonstrates that wildlife laws will be enforced uniformly, setting an important precedent for future cases involving protected species and their derivatives.

The ruling particularly highlights the ongoing global efforts to eliminate ivory trade and possession, which continues to threaten elephant populations worldwide.