Kerala Court Adjourns Bail Verdict for MLA Rahul Mamkootathil in Rape Case
The Pathanamthitta additional district sessions court has deferred its verdict on the bail application of MLA Rahul Mamkootathil, who was arrested in connection with a rape case. The court has adjourned the case to Wednesday, marking another delay in the high-profile legal proceedings.
Legal Journey from Thiruvalla to Pathanamthitta
Mamkootathil approached the Pathanamthitta court after the Thiruvalla magistrate court dismissed his initial bail plea. This move highlights the complex legal trajectory of the case, which has been closely watched across Kerala.
Recent Court Proceedings and Evidence Submission
Earlier on Wednesday, after hearing detailed arguments from both the prosecution and defense, the case was initially postponed to Saturday for a verdict. However, when the case was considered on Saturday morning, the defense presented significant new evidence.
The legislator's lawyer submitted audio clips featuring both the survivor and Mamkootathil, along with a WhatsApp voice message sent by the complainant. This digital evidence became a focal point of the proceedings.
Prosecution Challenges Evidence Authenticity
The prosecution raised serious doubts about the authenticity of the submitted evidence, particularly questioning the veracity of the WhatsApp voice message. They formally requested a scientific examination of the digital materials to determine their legitimacy.
This development created a legal impasse that necessitated further investigation before the court could proceed with its verdict.
Court's Decision to Postpone
Subsequently, the court decided to postpone the bail verdict, citing the need for proper examination of the contested evidence. The adjournment to Wednesday allows time for the prosecution's concerns to be addressed through appropriate forensic channels.
The case continues to draw significant public and media attention as it involves a sitting MLA facing serious criminal charges. The court's careful approach reflects the sensitivity and complexity of the matter, with both legal teams preparing for the next phase of arguments.
