High Court Orders Forensic Probe in 11-Year-Old's Suspicious School Death
High Court Orders Forensic Probe in Boy's Suspicious School Death

High Court Mandates Forensic Investigation in Tragic Death of 11-Year-Old Student

The Andhra Pradesh High Court has issued a directive for a comprehensive forensic examination into the suspicious death of an 11-year-old boy at Sri Chaitanya Navodaya School in Singarayakonda, Prakasam district. This ruling comes in response to a petition filed by the grieving parents, who allege foul play and have been pushing for a thorough investigation.

Background of the Case

On February 14, Syed Toushiq was discovered hanging in the washroom of his school. The incident sent shockwaves through the community, prompting immediate concerns from his family. Syed Ali and Md Moulibi, the boy's parents, expressed serious doubts about the circumstances surrounding their son's death. They moved the High Court seeking a Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) probe, citing allegations of assault and murder.

The parents have accused warden Babji and the son of school correspondent Chaitanya of assaulting Toushiq and causing his death. They further contend that local police are attempting to frame the incident as a suicide, rather than pursuing a murder investigation.

Wide Pickt banner — collaborative shopping lists app for Telegram, phone mockup with grocery list

Court's Previous Directives and Ongoing Proceedings

Earlier, the High Court had instructed the police to conduct the investigation under the supervision of an officer not below the rank of Additional Superintendent of Police (ASP). The court also mandated the preservation of all CCTV footage from within the school premises and its immediate vicinity to ensure no evidence is tampered with or lost.

During the recent hearing, advocate general Dammalapati Srinivas, representing the police, confirmed that an ASP-rank officer is actively investigating the case. He noted that while the case was initially registered as a suspicious death, the police would alter the charges based on the findings of their ongoing investigation.

Arguments from Both Sides

Senior counsel Posani Venkateswarlu, appearing for the school correspondent and his son, vehemently denied the allegations. He argued that there is no substantive basis for the parents' claims and suggested that the boy was emotionally distressed because his parents did not take him home for Sivarathri. Venkateswarlu even requested a forensic examination of the call records of Toushiq's parents to explore this angle further.

On the other side, Thandava Yogesh, representing the parents, presented critical evidence challenging the suicide theory. He pointed out that the hanger in the washroom was below the height of the boy, making it physically improbable for him to have committed suicide by hanging. Yogesh urged the court to order a detailed forensic examination of the crime scene to uncover the truth.

Court's Final Ruling and Future Steps

After carefully considering arguments from all parties, Justice Y Lakshmana Rao directed the Prakasam district police to conduct a forensic examination of the crime scene. This directive aims to provide clarity and ensure a transparent investigation into the tragic incident. The court has posted the matter for further hearing after three weeks, allowing time for the forensic analysis to be completed.

This case highlights ongoing concerns about student safety in educational institutions and the need for rigorous investigative protocols in such sensitive matters. The High Court's intervention underscores the judiciary's role in upholding justice and addressing public grievances in cases of alleged misconduct and cover-ups.

Pickt after-article banner — collaborative shopping lists app with family illustration