The controversy over alleged embezzlement of funds at the Ayodhya Ram Temple reached the Supreme Court on Monday, with two advocates filing a petition seeking registration of an FIR and a fair, time-bound probe by a CBI-led multi-disciplinary special investigation team (SIT). The petitioners, Ajay Kumar Rai and Dinesh Kumar Yadav, argued that the SIT should investigate alleged financial irregularities and other purported illegalities concerning the affairs and administration of the Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Teerth Kshetra Trust.
Background of the SIT and Its Mandate
On June 13, the Uttar Pradesh government set up a three-member SIT at the request of the temple trust to look into allegations of financial irregularities and misappropriation of donations. The SIT comprises Lucknow Divisional Commissioner Vijay Vishwas Pant, Inspector General of Police Kiran S, and Finance Department Special Secretary Neel Ratan. It has already begun its inquiry without the registration of an FIR or any formal criminal case. The SIT was asked to submit a preliminary report in seven days and a final report in 15 days. The preliminary report is expected to be submitted to Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath soon.
Petitioners Seek CBI-Led Probe for Public Confidence
The petitioners argued that the current SIT, composed of administrative officers, may not possess specialized credentials in criminal investigation. They submitted: "Whether or not the reports regarding missing funds and other alleged irregularities concerning the Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Teerth Kshetra Trust are ultimately found to be true, such reports have caused deep concern among the generations that struggled for the restoration of the glory of Ayodhya." They emphasized that an independent probe by a single agency equipped with expertise, resources, and institutional framework would inspire greater public confidence than a preliminary probe by administrative officers. The petition states that the allegations go beyond possible commission of cognizable offences and directly impact the faith, sentiments, and trust of countless devotees and members of the public.
Impact on Devotees and Demand for Regulatory Oversight
The petitioners have sought directions to the Centre, the Uttar Pradesh government, and the Trust to constitute and operationalize regulatory, supervisory, and audit mechanisms necessary to safeguard public interest and maintain the confidence of millions of devotees and donors. They argue that the controversy has already caused deep concern among those who struggled for the restoration of the glory of Ayodhya. The Supreme Court's intervention is sought to ensure a fair and transparent investigation that restores public trust in the administration and management of the Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Teerth Kshetra Trust.
