Supreme Court Issues Notice to Delhi Govt in Sukesh Chandrasekhar Extortion Case Bail Plea
SC Notice to Delhi Govt in Sukesh Chandrasekhar Extortion Case

The Supreme Court on Wednesday issued a notice to the Delhi government regarding a bail application filed by Leena Maria Paulose in a Rs 200 crore extortion case registered under the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA). The case involves her husband, alleged conman Sukesh Chandrasekhar. A bench comprising Justices Joymalya Bagchi and Vipul M. Pancholi scheduled the hearing for July 27.

On May 5, the Delhi High Court had denied bail to Paulose in the extortion case. However, she was granted bail in a related money laundering case being investigated by the Enforcement Directorate (ED).

This development comes weeks after a Delhi court ordered the framing of charges against Chandrasekhar, Paulose, actor Jacqueline Fernandez, and others in cases linked to the alleged extortion racket.

Wide Pickt banner — collaborative shopping lists app for Telegram, phone mockup with grocery list

Special Judge Prashant Sharma directed the framing of charges against Chandrasekhar, Paulose, and others under MCOCA in an extortion case registered by Delhi Police based on a complaint by Aditi Singh. The court also ordered charges against Chandrasekhar, Paulose, Fernandez, and others in the ED's money laundering case arising from the same alleged racket.

The ED case stems from an August 2021 FIR registered by the Economic Offences Wing (EOW), which alleged that Chandrasekhar posed as the Union law secretary and extorted money from Aditi Singh on the pretext of securing bail for her jailed husband. Investigators claimed that over Rs 200 crore was extorted and routed through shell companies, hawala channels, and luxury purchases.

While ordering charges, the court observed that Chandrasekhar had "knowingly indulged in the process of generating and layering proceeds of crime" and committed money laundering under Sections 3 and 4 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA).

The court rejected Jacqueline Fernandez's plea seeking discharge, noting that a person can be prosecuted under PMLA even if not named in the scheduled offence. It observed that Fernandez was "aware" of Chandrasekhar's criminal background yet continued to receive luxury gifts and other benefits allegedly linked to proceeds of crime.

In the MCOCA case, Delhi Police alleged that Aditi Singh was extorted of around Rs 217 crore after receiving calls from a person posing as a senior law ministry official. Investigators later traced the alleged conspiracy to Chandrasekhar, who was lodged in Rohini Jail at the time.

The prosecution also alleged that Paulose remained in contact with Chandrasekhar during his incarceration and coordinated with associates and jail officials, attracting charges under MCOCA.

Pickt after-article banner — collaborative shopping lists app with family illustration