Supreme Court Rebukes Maneka Gandhi Over Stray Dog Remarks
The Supreme Court of India voiced clear displeasure on Tuesday. It reacted sharply to former minister Maneka Gandhi's public criticism of its orders in the stray dogs case. The apex court stated plainly that her actions amounted to contempt of court.
Court Cites Magnanimity in Withholding Contempt Action
Despite this strong declaration, the Supreme Court chose not to initiate formal contempt proceedings against Maneka Gandhi. The bench explicitly attributed this decision to the court's own magnanimity. This move highlights the judiciary's restraint even when faced with direct criticism of its rulings.
Budgetary Questions Posed to the Former Minister
The court did not stop at expressing its disapproval. It directed pointed questions toward Maneka Gandhi regarding her practical contributions to the issue. The justices asked her to specify what budgetary allocations she had actually helped secure to address the persistent stray dog problem across the country.
This inquiry shifts the focus from mere commentary to tangible action. It underscores the court's expectation that public figures who comment on judicial matters should also demonstrate concrete efforts toward solutions.
The proceedings, reported by PTI, reveal a firm judicial stance. The Supreme Court maintains its authority while questioning the substantive involvement of critics in resolving the complex issue of stray animals.
