BJP leader K. Annamalai has strongly criticised the Central Board of Secondary Education's decision to implement the three-language policy from the current academic year, urging the Centre to withdraw the move. Annamalai stated that the sudden enforcement has caused widespread concern among parents, particularly in Tamil Nadu, where language policies are a sensitive issue.
Policy Reversal Sparks Confusion
According to Annamalai, CBSE had initially announced in April 2026 that the three-language policy would become compulsory for Class 9 students starting from the 2029-30 academic year. This timeline was intended to give schools and students ample time to prepare. However, a fresh circular issued on May 15, 2026, abruptly directed all affiliated schools to implement the rule from July 1, 2026, leaving little room for adjustment.
Annamalai emphasised that forcing students to learn a new language within such a short period could lead to significant mental stress and negatively impact their academic performance. He argued that the policy should be introduced gradually, with proper planning and resources, rather than being imposed mid-session.
Concerns Over Academic Pressure
The revised CBSE policy mandates the study of three languages at the secondary level, with at least two of them being Indian languages. This has raised concerns among families and schools about increased academic pressure on students, who are already coping with a rigorous curriculum. Many fear that the sudden change could disrupt the learning process and create an uneven playing field for students from different linguistic backgrounds.
Annamalai's criticism adds to the growing chorus of voices questioning the Centre's approach to language policy in education. While the government maintains that the policy promotes national integration and multilingualism, critics argue that it overlooks regional sensitivities and practical challenges.
As the July 1 deadline approaches, stakeholders await further clarity from CBSE and the Ministry of Education on whether the decision will be reconsidered or modified to address the concerns raised.
