The Supreme Court of India is set to hear a petition next week that challenges the Central Board of Secondary Education's (CBSE) three-language policy mandate for Class 9 students. The plea raises concerns about the feasibility of implementing the policy and the potential burden it may impose on students, teachers, and the broader education system.
Background of the Three-Language Policy
The three-language formula, originally part of the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020, requires students to study three languages, including at least two native Indian languages. CBSE's recent directive made this mandate compulsory for Class 9 students from the academic year 2026-27, sparking debate among educators and parents.
Petitioners' Concerns
Petitioners argue that the policy could overburden students, particularly those from non-Hindi speaking states, and may lead to logistical challenges in schools lacking adequate language teachers. They also claim that the mandate contradicts the spirit of NEP 2020, which emphasizes flexibility and choice.
- Feasibility issues in schools with limited resources
- Potential increase in academic stress for students
- Lack of trained language teachers in many regions
Next Steps
The Supreme Court bench is expected to hear arguments from both sides and may issue an interim order on the implementation of the policy. Education experts await the verdict as it could set a precedent for language policies across India.
CBSE has defended its decision, stating that the policy aims to promote multilingualism and national integration. The board has also assured that schools will be given adequate time and resources to comply.
