Editorial: Failure of Negotiations on the Money-Lenders' Bill
The Tribune expresses profound regret over the collapse of negotiations to delay the consideration of the Money-Lenders' Bill. The mover's refusal to accommodate the opposition's request for postponement is deemed utterly incomprehensible. The only justification provided—'the necessities of truth and the economic necessities of the situation'—was dismissed as absurd.
Questioning the Urgency
The editorial argues that if the province has managed without such a Bill for years, it could certainly wait a few more months. The mover's insistence on immediate passage suggests that the Bill may not reflect the true will of the people. If the Bill were genuinely desired, voters would naturally re-elect the mover and strengthen his support base, making postponement a useful test of public opinion.
Political Implications
The article warns that rushing the Bill could backfire if a new Council, possibly without the mover, does not share the same view. Such an outcome would indicate that the Bill was not wanted by those it is meant to benefit.
