UP Court Delays Sanjay Singh's Poll Code Case Hearing to February 27
UP Court Delays Sanjay Singh's Poll Code Case Hearing

Uttar Pradesh Court Postpones Hearing in Poll Code Case Against AAP's Sanjay Singh

In a significant legal development, a court in Uttar Pradesh has deferred the hearing in the election code violation case against Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leader Sanjay Singh. The new date for the proceedings has been set for February 27, 2026, marking a delay in the judicial process concerning alleged breaches of conduct during electoral activities.

Details of the Case and Accused Individuals

The case, which has garnered attention in political circles, was registered by the police against a total of 12 named persons, including Sanjay Singh, who is a prominent figure in AAP. Additionally, the complaint lists 45 unidentified supporters, broadening the scope of the investigation into potential violations of the model code of conduct. This code is enforced by the Election Commission of India to ensure fair play during elections, and any infractions can lead to legal repercussions.

The allegations stem from incidents that occurred during election campaigning, where authorities claim that rules were not adhered to, possibly affecting the integrity of the electoral process. The deferral of the hearing suggests that the court requires more time to review evidence or accommodate legal schedules, highlighting the complexities involved in such cases.

Implications for AAP and Political Landscape

This development comes at a crucial time for AAP, as the party navigates various legal and political challenges across India. Sanjay Singh, known for his vocal stance on issues, now faces this legal hurdle, which could impact his political career and the party's image. The case underscores the ongoing scrutiny of political figures regarding compliance with election laws, a topic of national importance.

As the hearing approaches in late February, stakeholders will be closely monitoring the proceedings for outcomes that might influence future electoral conduct and enforcement. The involvement of multiple accused, including unnamed supporters, adds a layer of complexity, potentially leading to further investigations or clarifications in the coming weeks.