In a recent development, a Karnataka minister has firmly denied allegations that the state government withdrew Rs 10 crore allocated for gate work at the Tungabhadra dam. This statement comes as a direct response to claims made by dam construction expert Kannayya Naidu, who asserted that the funds were taken back through a book adjustment process.
Background of the Controversy
The controversy erupted after Kannayya Naidu, a noted expert in dam construction, publicly stated that the Karnataka government had reclaimed Rs 10 crore previously sanctioned for critical gate maintenance and upgrades at the Tungabhadra dam. According to Naidu, this withdrawal was executed via a book adjustment, a method that involves reallocating funds without physical cash movement, often raising questions about transparency and project continuity.
Minister's Rebuttal and Clarifications
The minister, whose identity is associated with overseeing infrastructure projects in Karnataka, categorically refuted these claims. In his reaction, he emphasized that the state government remains committed to the Tungabhadra dam's development and safety, with no such withdrawal of funds occurring. He highlighted that the allocated Rs 10 crore is still earmarked for the gate work, ensuring the dam's operational efficiency and structural integrity.
Further elaborating, the minister pointed out that such allegations could mislead the public and create unnecessary panic about the dam's maintenance. He assured stakeholders that all financial transactions related to the Tungabhadra project are conducted with utmost transparency and in accordance with established protocols.
Implications for Tungabhadra Dam and Regional Infrastructure
The Tungabhadra dam, a vital water resource and hydroelectric project spanning Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh, plays a crucial role in irrigation, power generation, and flood control for the region. Any disruptions in funding for its gate work could potentially impact these functions, affecting agriculture, local communities, and economic activities.
By denying the withdrawal, the minister aims to reassure residents and authorities about the ongoing efforts to maintain and enhance the dam's infrastructure. This incident underscores the importance of clear communication and accountability in public projects, especially those involving significant public funds and environmental considerations.
As the situation unfolds, stakeholders are calling for detailed audits and reports to verify the fund's status, ensuring that the Tungabhadra dam continues to serve its purpose without hindrance. The minister's statement is seen as a step towards addressing concerns and maintaining trust in Karnataka's governance of key infrastructure initiatives.
