Karnataka High Court Dismisses Congress MLA's Appeal in False Caste Certificate Case
Karnataka HC Dismisses MLA's Appeal in Caste Certificate Case

Karnataka High Court Rejects Congress MLA's Appeal in False Caste Certificate Case

In a significant legal development, the Karnataka High Court has delivered a major setback to G Manjunatha, the current Congress MLA representing the Kolar constituency. A division bench of the court has dismissed his writ appeal concerning allegations of submitting a false caste certificate, thereby upholding a previous ruling and granting the state government authority to pursue appropriate actions against him.

Court's Ruling and Key Observations

The division bench, comprising Chief Justice Vibhu Bakhru and Justice CM Poonacha, affirmed the order of a single bench from December 20, 2023, which had rejected Manjunatha's petition. The petition challenged a report by the District Caste Verification Committee (DCVC) dated October 27, 2021, and sought validation of a caste certificate issued on April 3, 2012, classifying him under the Scheduled Caste category as belonging to the Budaga Jangama caste.

The court highlighted serious allegations against Manjunatha, noting that he had applied for a caste certificate in 2008, which was rejected, and his appeal against this decision was also turned down. Despite this, he produced another certificate in 2012. However, the tahsildar issued an endorsement stating that this certificate was issued by misusing computer systems at the office, with no official record of its issuance. The bench emphasized that it is open for the state to consider initiating proceedings based on these findings.

Wide Pickt banner — collaborative shopping lists app for Telegram, phone mockup with grocery list

Background and Contention Details

Manjunatha argued that evidence supported his claim of belonging to the Budaga Jangama caste under the SC category, but this was not considered. He also contended that the single bench delayed delivering the judgment by eight months after reserving it. However, the division bench rejected this argument, stating that a judgment should not be set aside merely due to such a delay.

The DCVC's investigation revealed that Manjunatha's school records listed his caste as 'Byragi', which falls under the Backward Class (BC) category. He claimed that his parents erroneously stated their caste as 'Byragi' and that school authorities recorded it based on their attire. The DCVC did not accept this explanation, noting that neither Manjunatha nor his parents objected to the caste entry in his transfer certificate at the time. The court further observed that while school records have varying probative value, they are not without evidentiary weight, and there was no prior claim by Manjunatha to belong to the SC category before 2008.

Implications and Next Steps

This ruling confirms the single bench's order against Manjunatha, potentially leading to legal consequences for the false caste certificate submission. The case underscores the judiciary's stance on integrity in caste certification processes and may impact political and legal proceedings in Karnataka. The state government is now empowered to take suitable action, which could include further investigations or penalties.

Pickt after-article banner — collaborative shopping lists app with family illustration