Rajasthan Government Seeks Extension for Local Body Elections Citing Multiple Constraints
Rajasthan Seeks Extension for Local Body Elections in High Court

Rajasthan Government Seeks Extension for Local Body Elections Citing Multiple Constraints

The state government of Rajasthan on Monday formally approached the Rajasthan High Court with an application requesting an extension of time to conduct elections for urban local bodies and panchayati raj institutions. The government cited significant legal, administrative, and logistical constraints as the primary reasons for being unable to meet the previously established deadline.

Court Proceedings and Contempt Notices

The application was submitted through Advocate General Rajendra Prasad in the ongoing Public Interest Litigation (PIL) titled Sanyam Lodha vs State of Rajasthan before the Jaipur bench. This move follows the High Court's issuance of contempt notices on April 2 to the State Election Commission and Election Commissioner Rajeshwar Singh due to the persistent delay in organizing the polls.

In its submission, the state government explicitly stated that it could not comply with the April 15 deadline set by the High Court in its order dated November 14, 2025, despite making sincere efforts. The government documented several critical factors contributing to this delay, placing them on record for judicial consideration.

Wide Pickt banner — collaborative shopping lists app for Telegram, phone mockup with grocery list

Key Reasons for the Delay

OBC Commission Delays: A major obstacle highlighted was the prolonged timeline of the OBC Commission, which was constituted on May 9, 2025. The commission repeatedly requested extensions to finalize its comprehensive report. The government argued that conducting elections without implementing updated OBC reservation data would contradict fundamental principles of social justice. Only after receiving this report can the state complete the crucial processes of seat identification and reservation determination for Scheduled Castes (SC), Scheduled Tribes (ST), Other Backward Classes (OBC), and women.

Legal and Administrative Hurdles: The state also pointed to multiple pending petitions and legal ambiguities, particularly concerning urban local bodies, which have delayed the finalization of accurate electoral rolls. Additionally, the logistical challenge of coordinating elections across thousands of polling booths and deploying lakhs of polling personnel necessitates substantial additional preparation time.

Climatic Constraints: Citing adverse weather conditions, the government noted that the extreme summer heat and the impending monsoon season create unsuitable environments for conducting smooth and safe elections, further complicating the timeline.

Government's Assurance and Next Steps

Assuring the court that there was no deliberate intention to delay the electoral process, the state government emphasized its commitment to holding elections at the earliest possible opportunity in alignment with constitutional mandates. The High Court will now deliberate on whether to grant the requested extension, a decision that will significantly impact the scheduling of these crucial local democratic exercises.

Pickt after-article banner — collaborative shopping lists app with family illustration