Amnesty International Condemns Life Sentences for Baloch Activists
Amnesty International has strongly condemned the life imprisonment sentences handed down to prominent Baloch activists Dr Mahrang Baloch and Sibghat Ullah Shah Jee. The human rights organization described the verdict as a violation of fair trial standards and evidence of Pakistan's alleged misuse of anti-terrorism laws to suppress peaceful dissent.
Details of the Verdict
An anti-terrorism court in Quetta sentenced Mahrang Baloch and Sibghat Ullah Shah Jee to life imprisonment over their alleged involvement in a 2024 protest during which a security official was killed. According to Amnesty International, the convictions stemmed from what it described as an expedited and secret trial conducted inside a jail facility. Serious concerns were raised regarding due process and compliance with international fair trial standards, while no direct evidence was presented linking either activist to the killing.
Amnesty's Response
In a press release, Amnesty International's Acting Regional Director for South Asia, Isabelle Lassee, stated that the convictions represented "an affront to the right to a fair trial" and accused authorities of cynically employing anti-terrorism legislation against human rights defenders. Lassee also highlighted what Amnesty called a prolonged period of unlawful detention. Mahrang Baloch was arrested in March 2025 after participating in a peaceful sit-in and subsequently faced more than two dozen anti-terrorism cases registered across Pakistan. Amnesty argued that the large number of cases made it difficult for her legal team to effectively defend her.
Background of the Activists
Mahrang Baloch and Sibghat Ullah Shah Jee are leading members of the Baloch Yakjehti Committee (BYC), a civil rights movement that campaigns against enforced disappearances, alleged extrajudicial killings, and economic marginalisation in Balochistan. They have remained in detention since protests erupted in March 2025, alongside several other Baloch activists facing multiple cases linked to their activism.
Demand for Release
Amnesty International maintained that both activists were being targeted because of their human rights advocacy and demanded their immediate release, along with the withdrawal of all charges connected to their activism.
