Senator Hawley Clashes with Indian-Origin Doctor Over Pregnancy Question in Abortion Pill Hearing
Hawley Questions Doctor on Men's Pregnancy in Senate Hearing

Senate Abortion Pill Hearing Erupts in Tense Exchange Over Pregnancy Question

A United States Senate committee meeting about abortion pill safety and rules became unexpectedly tense this Wednesday. The focus shifted dramatically when Senator Josh Hawley repeatedly questioned an Indian-origin obstetrician-gynecologist about a biological issue. He pressed Dr. Nisha Verma directly on whether men have the capacity to become pregnant.

Hearing Intended for Medication Abortion Safety Discussions

The session before the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee was originally scheduled to examine important medical topics. Lawmakers planned to discuss the safety of medication abortion, specifically involving the drug mifepristone. This medication serves as the first pill in a standard two-drug regimen for ending pregnancies.

Additional concerns on the agenda included potential cases of coerced use or unsafe practices with abortion pills. Dr. Nisha Verma, who provides reproductive healthcare services in both Georgia and Massachusetts, appeared as an expert witness. Democratic committee members invited her to share her professional insights.

Questioning Takes a Controversial Turn

Senator Ashley Moody initially raised the topic of men obtaining abortion pills, possibly to pressure their partners. Dr. Verma responded by emphasizing her inclusive approach to patient care. She explained that she treats "people with many identities." Her answer avoided a direct biological classification.

Senator Hawley then intensified the line of questioning. He challenged Dr. Verma to clarify her position based on scientific evidence. "The goal is just to establish a biological reality," Hawley stated firmly. "You said just a moment ago that science and evidence should control, not politics... Can men get pregnant?"

Dr. Verma expressed hesitation and described such yes-or-no questions as "polarizing." She did not provide a definitive answer. Hawley continued to press his point during the exchange, which quickly spread across social media platforms.

Hawley Insists on Biological Definitions

The senator grew more forceful in his statements. "It is not polarizing to say that women are a biological reality and should be treated and protected as such," he argued. "That is not polarizing. That is truth... For the record, it is women who get pregnant, not men."

This confrontation highlighted a significant cultural and political divide. The debate touches on definitions of gender, biological science, and medical terminology. Dr. Verma maintained her focus on patient-centered care throughout the challenging questioning.

The hearing demonstrated how discussions about reproductive health can quickly expand beyond medical safety. They often enter contentious territory involving identity, politics, and fundamental beliefs. This particular exchange captured national attention and sparked widespread online commentary.