A special CBI court in Chandigarh on Friday framed corruption charges against suspended Punjab Deputy Inspector General (DIG) Harcharan Singh Bhullar and his alleged intermediary Krishanu Sharda in a bribery case registered last year. The court dismissed discharge applications filed by both accused and ordered the commencement of trial.
Case Background and Allegations
The case was initiated on a complaint from Akash Batta, who alleged that Bhullar, while serving as DIG of the Ropar Range in Punjab Police, demanded illegal gratification through Sharda. The bribe was sought to provide favorable treatment in an FIR registered at Police Station Sirhind and to ensure no coercive action was taken against the complainant's business.
Following the complaint, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) laid a trap and apprehended Sharda on October 16, 2025, while he was allegedly accepting Rs 5 lakh as part of the demanded bribe from the complainant. Bhullar was arrested on the same day.
Legal Proceedings and Charges
The CBI filed a charge sheet under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) in December 2025. During the hearing on discharge applications, counsel for the accused argued that the CBI lacked authority to register the case. However, CBI Public Prosecutor Narender Singh opposed the plea and argued in favor of framing charges.
After hearing arguments, Special Judge (CBI) framed charges against both accused under Section 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), read with Sections 7 and 12 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. According to the court, there was sufficient prima facie evidence to proceed with the trial.
Trial Schedule and Next Steps
The trial in the matter is scheduled to begin on July 23. Both accused remain suspended from service pending the outcome of the case. The court has directed the prosecution to produce witnesses and evidence on the first date of hearing.
The case highlights ongoing efforts by the CBI to tackle corruption in the Punjab Police force. Bhullar, a senior IPS officer, had served in various capacities before his suspension. The outcome of the trial could have significant implications for police accountability in the state.
