Delhi Court Delivers Harsh Verdict on Animal Shelter's Conduct
A Delhi court issued strong criticism against an animal shelter this week. The court observed that the facility acted more like a custodian than a true guardian of animals. This case involves the seizure of ten dogs belonging to petitioner Vishal.
Shelter Failed to Substantiate Cruelty Claims
The Sanjay Gandhi Animal Care Centre originally took custody of the dogs. They alleged that Vishal subjected the animals to cruelty. However, the shelter could not provide sufficient evidence to support these serious allegations.
The trial court responded by ordering the release of the dogs on multiple occasions. The first release order came in August 2025. The court issued another order in December 2025. A third order followed on January 13, when the court demanded a detailed report about the animals' condition.
Shelter's Explanation Deemed Unsatisfactory
The shelter failed to submit the required report by January 16. Officials cited a lack of time as their reason. Additional Sessions Judge Surabhi Sharma Vats found this explanation completely unacceptable.
Judge Vats emphasized that animal shelters carry a fundamental duty. They must protect animal life and preserve animal dignity. The court described the shelter's explanation about the dogs as totally unsatisfactory.
The shelter made contradictory statements during proceedings. They claimed all ten dogs remained in their custody. Simultaneously, they suggested the animals might have died. The court noted this inconsistency with concern.
Court Demands Immediate Action
Frustrated by the shelter's repeated failures, the court issued a clear directive. They ordered the immediate release of all ten dogs to their owner. This decision highlights the importance of proper evidence in animal cruelty cases.
Animal welfare organizations face increased scrutiny following this ruling. The case demonstrates that shelters must uphold high standards of care and transparency. Courts will not tolerate unsubstantiated claims or poor management practices.
This ruling serves as a reminder to all animal care facilities. They must fulfill their responsibilities with diligence and integrity. The legal system will hold them accountable when they fall short of their duties.
