Kerala HC Quashes Rape Case: No Offence When Accused Posed as Single Man to Married Woman
Kerala HC quashes rape case in false marriage promise ruling

In a significant legal ruling that clarifies the boundaries of consent and deception in relationships, the Kerala High Court has dismissed a rape case against a man who had a relationship with a married woman while pretending to be unmarried himself.

The Case That Redefined Legal Boundaries

The controversial case involved a man who was accused of rape under the pretext of false promise of marriage. However, the court observed a crucial detail that changed everything: the woman was already married at the time of the relationship.

Court's Groundbreaking Reasoning

Justice Kauser Edappagath delivered the landmark judgment, stating that the accused's false representation of being unmarried couldn't be considered a false promise of marriage under Indian law. The court emphasized that since the woman was already bound in matrimony, she wasn't legally free to marry the accused regardless of his marital status.

"The promise of marriage in such circumstances is inherently false and unenforceable," the court noted, highlighting the legal impossibility of the situation.

Understanding the Legal Nuances

The judgment clarifies several important legal principles:

  • Consent obtained through deception must be specifically related to the nature of the act or identity of the person
  • False promise of marriage constitutes rape only when the promise was made in bad faith from the beginning
  • The woman's existing marital status made any promise of marriage legally unenforceable
  • The accused's falsehood about his marital status didn't vitiate the woman's consent

Broader Implications

This ruling sets an important precedent in Indian jurisprudence, particularly in cases involving complex relationship dynamics and allegations of consent obtained through deception. The court's decision reinforces that not every falsehood in a relationship amounts to rape under the Indian Penal Code.

The judgment also acknowledges the reality that relationships often involve various levels of disclosure and privacy, and the legal system must distinguish between personal deception and criminal offense.