The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has launched a scathing attack on Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal, accusing him of resorting to vendetta politics after an FIR was registered against Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) Rajya Sabha MP Sandeep Pathak. The BJP claims that the case is a politically motivated move to silence opposition voices.
Background of the Case
Sandeep Pathak, who is also the national secretary of AAP, was booked by the Delhi Police in connection with an alleged violation of the model code of conduct during the recent MCD elections. The FIR was filed based on a complaint by a BJP worker, who accused Pathak of distributing money to voters. However, AAP has dismissed the allegations as baseless and part of a conspiracy by the BJP to target its leaders.
BJP's Response
Reacting to the development, BJP spokesperson Sambit Patra said, "Arvind Kejriwal has a history of using state machinery to settle political scores. This latest action against Sandeep Pathak is nothing but a reflection of his frustration and vendetta politics." Patra further alleged that the AAP government in Delhi has been involved in several corruption cases and is now trying to divert attention by targeting opposition leaders.
AAP's Defense
On the other hand, AAP leaders have defended Pathak, stating that the FIR is a "desperate attempt" by the BJP to undermine the party's growing popularity. Party spokesperson Reena Gupta said, "Sandeep Pathak is a respected leader who has always followed the law. This false case will not deter us from exposing the BJP's misrule."
Political Implications
The incident has further escalated tensions between the two parties ahead of the upcoming municipal elections. Political analysts believe that the BJP's accusation of vendetta politics could become a major campaign issue, with both parties trading charges. The AAP has been accusing the BJP of misusing central agencies to target its leaders, while the BJP counters by pointing to alleged corruption in the Kejriwal government.
Legal Proceedings
Meanwhile, Sandeep Pathak has denied all charges and announced that he will cooperate with the investigation. His legal team is expected to seek anticipatory bail in the coming days. The case is likely to be heard in a Delhi court soon.
As the political battle intensifies, the public remains divided. Some see the FIR as a genuine legal action, while others view it as a tool for political harassment. The coming weeks will reveal how this development impacts the electoral landscape in Delhi.
