During a Supreme Court hearing on a plea related to senior advocate designation, Chief Justice of India Surya Kant delivered strong observations about professional conduct, activism, and social media criticism. The bench emphasized that the status of senior advocate should not be treated as a title to be pursued through lobbying.
Key Remarks by the CJI
Chief Justice Surya Kant expressed concern over the standards within the legal profession, noting that the designation of senior advocate is a recognition of merit and experience, not a privilege to be obtained through undue influence. He stated that the process must remain transparent and free from any form of lobbying.
Concerns Over Activism and Social Media
The bench also raised issues regarding activism and social media criticism by lawyers, suggesting that such behavior undermines the dignity of the legal profession. The CJI remarked that lawyers should maintain a high standard of conduct both inside and outside the courtroom.
Petitioner's Response
Following the court's observations, the petitioner in the case tendered an apology and withdrew the plea. The court accepted the withdrawal, noting that the matter had been resolved amicably.
Implications for the Legal Community
This incident highlights the judiciary's commitment to upholding the integrity of the legal profession. It serves as a reminder that the designation of senior advocate is a mark of distinction that should be earned through hard work and ethical practice, not through lobbying or external pressures.
