MP Anto Antony Demands Rs 1 Crore Compensation in Defamation Case Against CPM Leader
In a significant development, Pathanamthitta MP Anto Antony has served a legal notice to CPM state committee member K P Udayabhanu, demanding a substantial compensation of Rs 1 crore for alleged defamation. The notice asserts that Udayabhanu made highly defamatory and unsubstantiated statements against Antony through his Facebook page, specifically via live videos broadcast on January 27 and February 8.
Allegations of Financial Misconduct
The legal notice details that in one of the videos, Udayabhanu claimed the Special Investigation Team (SIT) found that the Sabarimala tanthri deposited Rs 2.5 crore in Nedumparambil Finance, which is owned by N M Raju. Furthermore, Udayabhanu alleged there was public talk that Antony took Rs 2.5 crore from this institution. The CPM leader also urged the SIT to probe Antony's financial dealings with the tanthri, as cited in the notice.
Additionally, the notice references Udayabhanu's statement that Antony received Rs 2 crore from Raju and returned only Rs 20 lakh. These allegations have sparked controversy, with Antony's legal team demanding immediate action.
Demands and Deadline
The legal notice has set a strict deadline, requiring Udayabhanu to remove the contentious videos from his Facebook page and issue an unconditional public apology within 15 days of receiving the notice. Failure to comply could lead to further legal proceedings, including a potential lawsuit for defamation and compensation.
Udayabhanu's Response
Reacting to the notice, K P Udayabhanu stated he would face the legal challenge head-on. "Why should I apologise? It is Antony who should apologise to society for receiving money," he asserted. Udayabhanu further hinted that more details on financial irregularities would soon emerge, adding to the ongoing political tension.
He elaborated on the core issue, stating, "The relevant matter was that Antony took Rs 2 crore from Raju, and Raju made it clear in a news conference. Antony agreed that he took the money. Antony should say why and how he took the money." This response indicates a firm stance from the CPM leader, setting the stage for a potential legal battle.
Broader Implications
This incident highlights the escalating political rivalries in Kerala, with defamation cases becoming a common tool in public disputes. The involvement of high-profile figures like an MP and a CPM state committee member underscores the seriousness of the allegations and the potential impact on their political careers.
As the 15-day deadline approaches, all eyes are on Udayabhanu's next move. Will he comply with the demands, or will this escalate into a full-blown court case? The outcome could set a precedent for how defamation claims are handled in the political arena, especially with the use of social media platforms like Facebook for making public accusations.
The situation remains fluid, with both parties preparing for possible legal confrontations. Observers note that such cases often reflect deeper political strategies, aiming to discredit opponents ahead of key elections or policy debates. Regardless of the legal outcome, this dispute is likely to fuel further discussions on ethics, transparency, and accountability in public life.
