Anand Pocso Court Sentences Man to 20 Years for Raping Minor Girl in Gujarat
20-Year Sentence for Man Who Raped Minor Girl in Gujarat Village

Anand Pocso Court Imposes 20-Year Rigorous Imprisonment for Minor Rape Case

A special court designated under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (Pocso) Act in Anand district, Gujarat, has delivered a stern verdict, sentencing a man to 20 years of rigorous imprisonment for the abduction and rape of a 17-year-old girl from Umeta village in Anklav taluka. The court, presided over by special judge and additional sessions judge Jhankhna Trivedi in Petlad, also imposed a fine of Rs 26,000 on the convict and directed that the victim be paid Rs 4,00,000 as compensation.

Details of the Abduction and Assault

The accused, identified as Suresh alias Feroze Mansang Vaghela, a resident of Gajniyu Faliyu in Umeta village, allegedly lured the minor victim on November 10, 2024, with promises of marriage. He then took her to Rangpur village in Botad district, where he kept her at various farmhouses for approximately 10 days. During this period, he repeatedly engaged in non-consensual sexual intercourse with her, exploiting her trust and vulnerability.

Key aspects of the case include:

  • The victim and the accused belong to the same community, but the girl resided in a village within Petlad taluka.
  • The accused occasionally visited this village as his maternal home was located there, which facilitated his interaction with the victim.
  • After the girl's parents filed a complaint, the Petlad rural police registered a First Information Report (FIR) under relevant sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 6 of the Pocso Act.

Investigation and Legal Proceedings

A dedicated police team successfully traced the minor girl and the accused to Ajmer, leading to his subsequent arrest. During the trial, the accused submitted a written response denying all allegations, claiming he merely assisted the girl because her parents were pressuring her into an unwanted marriage. He maintained his innocence throughout the proceedings.

The prosecution presented a compelling case, emphasizing that:

  1. The victim was a minor at the time of the incident, rendering any notion of consent legally irrelevant under the Pocso Act.
  2. Evidence conclusively demonstrated that the accused abducted her without parental consent and engaged in sexual relations, constituting a grave offense.
  3. Such actions warranted stringent punishment to uphold justice and deter similar crimes.

The court heard oral arguments from both the prosecution and defense before delivering its verdict, which underscores the judiciary's commitment to protecting children from sexual exploitation. This ruling serves as a significant reminder of the legal consequences for such heinous acts, particularly in cases involving minors.