Yadgir Court Denies Anticipatory Bail to Self-Styled Godman in Pocso Case
In a significant legal development, a local court in Yadgir rejected the anticipatory bail application of self-styled godman Mallikarjun Muthya on Monday. Judge Marulasiddaradhya of the district principal and special Pocso court presided over the hearing and denied the plea, marking a setback for the accused.
Details of the Case and Legal Proceedings
Muthya faces serious charges under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (Pocso) Act for allegedly misbehaving with minor girls. Currently absconding, he had filed the anticipatory bail application in an attempt to avoid arrest. The case was initially registered at the Gogi police station, prompting Muthya to seek legal recourse.
He first approached the Kalaburagi bench of the high court but later withdrew that plea. Subsequently, he filed another application before the Yadgir district court, which has now been rejected. This legal maneuvering highlights the complexities of the case as Muthya attempts to evade custody.
Police Investigation Intensifies Post-Court Order
Following the court's decision, police authorities have ramped up their investigation efforts. They are actively preparing to arrest Muthya and are focusing on gathering digital evidence to strengthen the case. Reports indicate that four smartphones seized from Muthya are being examined for crucial data that could support the charges against him.
The intensified probe underscores the seriousness with which law enforcement is treating the allegations, aiming to ensure a thorough examination of all available evidence.
Devotees Protest and Defend Muthya
Meanwhile, devotees of Mallikarjun Muthya have escalated their agitation in response to the legal actions. They are demanding the withdrawal of the case filed at the Gogi police station, arguing that no direct victim or aggrieved person lodged the complaint. Instead, they claim the government registered it, raising questions about the origins of the allegations.
In defense of Muthya, his supporters stated, "Muthya was kind enough to resolve girls' issues, and he treats all girls as his daughters." This statement reflects the contentious nature of the case, with devotees portraying him as a benevolent figure, contrasting sharply with the serious legal charges he faces.
The situation remains tense as legal proceedings continue, with police determined to apprehend Muthya and his followers rallying in his support. The case highlights ongoing challenges in addressing such sensitive allegations within communities where religious figures hold significant influence.
