Javed Akhtar Calls MEA Statement 'Absurd'
Veteran lyricist and screenwriter Javed Akhtar has strongly criticized the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) for its recent statement that a passport is not proof of citizenship. In a series of posts on social media platform X, Akhtar termed the remark "absurd" and expressed concern over its implications for Indian citizens.
MEA's Controversial Statement
The controversy began when the MEA, in a reply to a Right to Information (RTI) application, stated that an Indian passport is not definitive proof of citizenship. The response, dated February 5, 2025, clarified that while a passport is a travel document, citizenship is determined by the Citizenship Act, 1955, and other relevant laws. The MEA further noted that the passport issuing authority may cancel or revoke a passport if it is found to have been obtained fraudulently or if the holder ceases to be a citizen.
Akhtar's Reaction
Reacting to the MEA's stance, Akhtar wrote on X: "It is absurd to say that a passport is not proof of citizenship. If a passport is not proof of citizenship, then what is? This statement opens the door for arbitrary actions against citizens." He urged the government to clarify the matter immediately to avoid confusion and potential harassment of ordinary citizens.
Legal and Political Implications
The MEA's statement has sparked a debate among legal experts and political commentators. Some argue that the MEA's position is technically correct, as citizenship is determined by law, and a passport is merely a document issued by the government. However, critics contend that this distinction could be misused to target individuals, particularly minorities or those critical of the government. The issue has also raised questions about the government's broader approach to citizenship, especially in the context of the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) and the National Register of Citizens (NRC).
Government's Clarification
In response to the backlash, MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal clarified that the RTI reply was not a policy change but a reiteration of existing legal provisions. He emphasized that a passport remains a valid travel document and is accepted as proof of identity and nationality for most purposes. However, for certain legal determinations, such as citizenship disputes, other documents may be required. The government has assured that there is no intention to create confusion or undermine the value of the passport.
Public Reaction and Expert Opinions
The MEA's statement and Akhtar's criticism have generated widespread discussion on social media and in the press. Many users expressed support for Akhtar, echoing his concerns about potential misuse. Legal experts have pointed out that while the MEA's position is legally sound, the timing and phrasing of the statement have caused unnecessary alarm. Some have called for a more nuanced explanation from the government to reassure citizens.
Conclusion
The controversy highlights the delicate balance between legal technicalities and public perception. As the government continues to navigate complex citizenship issues, clear communication will be essential to maintain trust. Javed Akhtar's intervention has brought the matter into the spotlight, prompting a much-needed debate on the rights and documentation of Indian citizens.
