The Supreme Court has proposed the creation of a statutory fund to support young first-generation lawyers, particularly those from economically weaker and marginalised sections, who face financial hardships in their initial years of practice. A bench led by Chief Justice Surya Kant also addressed the lack of women-friendly infrastructure in court complexes, including separate toilets, lounges, and nursing rooms, which deters women from continuing in the profession.
Grievances Raised by Women Lawyers
Senior advocate Monika Gusain, leading a group of women lawyers, highlighted that many court complexes lack basic amenities for women. She stated that meagre incomes or stipends for young first-generation advocates, especially those from marginalised backgrounds, force meritorious individuals to leave litigation-oriented practice.
Proposal for Young Lawyers' Professional Assistance Fund
The bench, comprising Chief Justice Kant and Justice V Mohana, termed the grievances genuine and proposed the creation of a 'Young Lawyers' Professional Assistance Fund'. The fund should be under the exclusive control of jurisdictional High Courts or an autonomous body constituted by the Union of India in consultation with state governments.
The bench described the initial years of practice for first-generation young lawyers as a period of turmoil, as stipends from seniors are inadequate to meet basic needs, pushing them to seek alternative professions. The court sought replies from the Centre, states, and Union Territories on establishing a statutory mechanism for such funds by July 17. It also sought assistance from Attorney General R Venkataramani, advocates general of states, and standing counsel for UTs.
Infrastructure for Women Lawyers
Reserving the resolution of problems faced by women lawyers for future hearings, the bench emphasised that when women advocates spend substantial time in court premises, basic infrastructure for comfort, privacy, safety, and professional functioning is crucial. The issue transcends administrative convenience and touches upon constitutional guarantees of dignity and equal participation in public life.
