Owaisi Slams RSS Chief's Savarkar Remarks, Alleges BJP Could Award Bharat Ratna to Godse
In a sharp political attack, AIMIM chief Asaduddin Owaisi has criticized RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat's recent comments on Vinayak Damodar Savarkar, suggesting that the Bharatiya Janata Party might even consider awarding the Bharat Ratna to Nathuram Godse. Owaisi's remarks came during a public address, where he expressed strong disapproval of Bhagwat's praise for Savarkar, a controversial historical figure in Indian politics.
Political Tensions Escalate Over Historical Figures
The controversy stems from Bhagwat's statement lauding Savarkar's contributions to India's freedom struggle, which has reignited debates about Savarkar's legacy and his association with Hindu nationalist ideologies. Owaisi, known for his outspoken views, seized the opportunity to lambast the RSS and BJP, accusing them of glorifying figures with divisive histories.
Owaisi stated, "When the RSS chief talks about Savarkar, it shows their mindset. Next, they might think of giving Bharat Ratna to Godse." This comment has sparked widespread reactions across the political spectrum, with many condemning it as inflammatory, while others see it as a critique of the BJP's historical narratives.
Background on Savarkar and Godse
Vinayak Damodar Savarkar, often referred to as Veer Savarkar, was a prominent freedom fighter and ideologue of Hindutva. His legacy is polarizing, with some viewing him as a patriot and others as a communal figure. Nathuram Godse, who assassinated Mahatma Gandhi, was influenced by Savarkar's ideologies, though Savarkar was acquitted of conspiracy charges in the assassination case.
The BJP and RSS have long advocated for recognizing Savarkar's contributions, with some leaders pushing for him to be posthumously awarded the Bharat Ratna, India's highest civilian honor. Owaisi's remark taps into this ongoing debate, highlighting the deep-seated political divisions over historical interpretation.
Reactions and Implications
Owaisi's statement has drawn criticism from BJP leaders, who accuse him of distorting history and making baseless allegations. Meanwhile, opposition parties have used this to question the BJP's commitment to secular values. The incident underscores the volatile nature of historical discourse in Indian politics, where figures like Savarkar and Godse remain flashpoints for ideological battles.
As the 2024 general elections approach, such controversies are likely to intensify, with parties leveraging historical narratives to mobilize their voter bases. Owaisi's comments reflect a broader strategy to challenge the BJP's dominance by targeting its ideological roots in the RSS and Hindutva movement.
In conclusion, this episode highlights the ongoing tensions in Indian politics over historical memory and national identity. With leaders like Owaisi and Bhagwat at the forefront, the debate over Savarkar's legacy and the potential for posthumous honors continues to stir passions and shape political discourse.
