Archaeologist KK Muhammed has sharply criticized Indian governments for viewing heritage sites as liabilities rather than assets. Speaking in Mysuru, the former regional director of the Archaeological Survey of India highlighted the neglect of historical and religious sites, particularly those of Hindu significance.
Comparison with Islamic Holy Sites
Muhammed drew a parallel between Hindu sacred cities and Islam's holiest places. "Ayodhya, Mathura and Kashi, to Hindus, are similar to Mecca and Medina for Muslims," he said. However, he noted that for Muslims, the structures in these Indian cities—mosques built on earlier Hindu temples—are not directly linked to the Prophet Muhammad. "They could be relocated," he added, suggesting a pragmatic solution to the long-standing disputes.
Call for Relocation
The archaeologist's remarks imply that the mosques at these sites, such as the Babri Masjid in Ayodhya (now replaced by a Ram temple) and others in Mathura and Varanasi, are not essential Islamic heritage. By proposing relocation, Muhammed argued that the underlying Hindu heritage should take precedence. He stressed that governments must treat such sites as cultural treasures rather than political liabilities.
Mysuru Context
Muhammed made these comments during an event in Mysuru, a city known for its own rich heritage. His statement has sparked discussions on the preservation of ancient sites and the need for a balanced approach to religious and historical claims.
