In a revealing interview from last year, Maharashtra Deputy Chief Minister Ajit Pawar was questioned about whether he had cautioned Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis regarding the significant financial strain anticipated from the Mukhyamantri Majhi Ladki Bahin scheme during its planning stages. Pawar responded candidly, stating, "If I had told the truth, we would not have been elected." This admission highlights the political pressures surrounding the scheme's implementation.
Financial Criticisms and Bureaucratic Notes
Pawar did not intervene to restrain bureaucrats within the finance department who raised concerns about the scheme's financial implications. These officials submitted detailed critiques to the cabinet in the lead-up to the 2024 assembly elections, pointing out the potential burdens of the sops. Their warnings underscored the challenges of balancing electoral promises with fiscal responsibility.
Budget Shortfalls and Stipend Promises
In March 2025, the first budget following the introduction of the Ladki Bahin scheme was presented, and Pawar faced criticism for failing to increase the monthly stipend from Rs 1,500 to Rs 2,100 as pledged in the Mahayuti alliance's election manifesto. He openly acknowledged the state's financial limitations, explaining, "Once our financial condition improves, we will do it." This statement reflects the ongoing struggle to meet voter expectations amid economic constraints.
Backlash from the Farming Community
Additionally, the Mahayuti alliance had committed to a farm loan waiver in its election manifesto. Pawar's straightforward remarks on this issue sparked a backlash from farmers. He admitted that the promise was made with electoral considerations in mind and advised farmers to settle their dues, further emphasizing the gap between campaign pledges and practical governance.
Overall, these developments illustrate the complex interplay between political promises and fiscal realities in Maharashtra, with Pawar's candid admissions shedding light on the state's budgetary challenges and the difficulties in fulfilling election commitments.
